Consistent matching information across views.
Keep related product views aligned.
Where this work fits
A score can suggest that someone fits a role without explaining why. The person reviewing it needs to see which requirement is supported, which conflicts with the profile, and which cannot yet be answered.
I worked across service contracts and product views to keep candidate information consistent. A factor needed to retain the same meaning when it moved between the job context, candidate profile, and the explanation shown on screen.
Open the reasoning behind a result
From a verdict to the evidence.
Built an inventory API and background jobs to sync product records.
Experience 01 + 02MatchRelevant work supports this requirement.
Each factor connects a job requirement to the candidate’s experience.
Missing evidence is different from a mismatch.
A simpler display would have been misleading if it flattened every factor into yes or no. The work preserved match, mismatch, and unknown states, then let people inspect the evidence without making them read everything at once.
The skills behind the work
- Kotlin
- Service-side changes where shared information and contracts need to stay consistent.
- Scala
- Backend development within established services, including asynchronous work and integration boundaries.
- API contracts
- Keep the meaning and format of information consistent between communicating systems.
People could move from a verdict to the reason and the experience behind it. The interface made uncertainty visible and reduced conflicting presentations of the same candidate.