← The Torre work01 / TORRE · CONTRIBUTION

Skills linked to supporting experience.

Keep career evidence connected to the right information.

Where this work fits

A score can suggest that someone fits a role without explaining why. The person reviewing it needs to see which requirement is supported, which conflicts with the profile, and which cannot yet be answered.

MY CONTRIBUTION

I improved connections between skills and the career experience supporting them. The work also preserved the distinction between absent information and an explicit answer, so downstream matching did not silently treat the two as equivalent.

THE IDEA, ILLUSTRATED

Follow a skill back to the evidence

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE · SKILL TO EXPERIENCE

One skill. The work behind it.

Backend development2 linked experiences
EXPERIENCE 01

Inventory API

Alex’s original profile1 association
EXPERIENCE 02

Product-data sync jobs

Alex’s original profile1 association

Two experiences. One traceable skill.Existing evidence stays connected when the update is repeated.

Stable links keep the profile connected to its owner.

THE ENGINEERING DECISION

Missing evidence is different from a mismatch.

A simpler display would have been misleading if it flattened every factor into yes or no. The work preserved match, mismatch, and unknown states, then let people inspect the evidence without making them read everything at once.

The skills behind the work

Data integrity
Keep records, ownership, and associations consistent as information changes.
Validation
Reject invalid or unsupported input before it affects the rest of the application.
Evidence attribution
Connect a claim or skill with the experience that supports it.
THE WIDER RESULT

People could move from a verdict to the reason and the experience behind it. The interface made uncertainty visible and reduced conflicting presentations of the same candidate.

READ THIS IN CONTEXTI made the reasons behind a match available to inspect. →
Related contributionsThe evidence behind a candidate matchI brought matching factors and their reasons into candidate and job views. People could inspect supporting experience and distinguish a match from a mismatch or an unanswered question. Shared components kept those meanings consistent across the interface.Consistent matching information across viewsI worked across service contracts and product views to keep candidate information consistent. A factor needed to retain the same meaning when it moved between the job context, candidate profile, and the explanation shown on screen.